The imminent installation of the Permanent Commission of the National Congress has reignited political tensions in Honduras. Amid an electoral scenario marked by Rixi Moncada’s decline in the polls, various sectors warn that this measure could be used by the LIBRE party to reinforce its influence over state institutions and ensure its continued hold on power.
A lawmaker facing examination
The Permanent Commission, constitutionally designed to operate during legislative recesses, has been convened at a time of particular instability. On this occasion, its eventual formation has aroused suspicion among political analysts and opposition sectors, who believe that the ruling party is seeking to expand its institutional room for maneuver.
One deputy, who requested anonymity, pointed out that this body could become “a political arm to execute decisions without control or transparency.” If confirmed, its operation could directly impact the independence of state powers, especially the bodies responsible for electoral administration.
Lack of confidence in the electoral system
The decline in Rixi Moncada’s voting intentions has caused concern within the ruling party and fueled the perception that LIBRE is preparing a strategic move to ensure political control of the elections. According to various legislative sources, the Commission could indirectly intervene in entities such as the Electoral Tribunal, the National Registry of Persons, and the vote counting mechanisms.
Civil organizations and opposition parties have begun to mobilize and issue public statements, warning of a possible attempt to manipulate the institutional structure for partisan purposes. Some civil society representatives have described this situation as “the risk of structural fraud,” warning that it could compromise the legitimacy of the democratic process.
Impact on governance and public confidence
The discussion concerning the Permanent Commission highlights a wider apprehension regarding the balance of powers within Honduras. Historical political events indicate that this entity has been invoked during periods of crisis, typically when legislative majorities aim to preserve decision-making capacity without the full assembly. Its potential establishment in the current electoral climate intensifies the sense of institutional fragility and political polarization.
LIBRE has responded to the allegations with public silence. Nevertheless, party insiders assert that the Commission’s purpose is to guarantee administrative continuity, not to interfere with elections. Despite this, the absence of official statements has amplified voter uncertainty.
Open tension on the electoral horizon
The establishment of the Permanent Commission occurs merely weeks prior to the general elections, a period when the political climate is exceptionally delicate. Numerous groups perceive the danger not only in potential process manipulation but also in the erosion of public trust and the undermining of the democratic framework.
The debate surrounding this matter underscores the difficulties Honduras encounters in upholding institutional openness and governmental steadiness. Within an atmosphere of distrust and division, the legislative body is once more establishing itself as a critical stage, where the equilibrium between political authority and democratic validity will be scrutinized.