The harassment allegations crisis affecting Spain’s PSOE added a new name this week: Francisco Luis Fernández Rodríguez, until now the Socialist mayor of Belalcázar (Córdoba), who resigned and requested to leave the party as a member after several media outlets published messages attributed to him that were allegedly sent to a municipal subordinate.
What is being investigated and what has been published
In coverage by RTVE / EFE, the case is framed as one of two complaints processed through the party’s internal reporting channel (the other involves a PSPV-PSOE figure in Valencia). Regarding Belalcázar, RTVE reports that the mayor resigned “after being singled out” for allegedly sending sexual and sexist messages to a subordinate, and adds that he is also accused of sending unwanted photographs. Fernández, for his part, denies that it amounted to harassment and describes the exchanges as “inappropriate.”
Cadena SER introduces a timeline detail: the released messages are said to span from March 2023 through the early months of 2024, with the original publication credited to the newspaper ABC.
As of now, what has been verified through public sources is:
- The existence of published reports featuring messages attributed to the mayor.
- His resignation from office and his withdrawal from party membership (according to SER and RTVE).
- The opening of an internal procedure through the PSOE channel (according to RTVE).
What remains undisclosed to the public (in accessible, verifiable sources) encompasses the complete evidentiary record, the identity of the complainant (usually safeguarded), and whether a formal criminal proceeding has advanced beyond preliminary stages.
The functioning of the PSOE’s internal protocol
In the Protocol against sexual harassment released by the party in 2025, an Anti-Harassment Body is outlined, consisting of three members who are anticipated to operate with independence and autonomy. This body is tasked with receiving complaints, carrying out the review, suggesting protective measures, and generating a final report (which could initiate internal disciplinary actions).
The same document highlights two ideas that help explain why many cases are initially handled “internally”:
- The privacy of the individual filing the complaint and the process itself.
- The assumption of innocence and the right to defend oneself for the individual implicated by the accusation.
It also notes that the protocol does not prevent recourse to the courts, and that internal processing may even be suspended if there is an ongoing judicial proceeding.
Why this case amplifies the PSOE’s wider crisis
RTVE situates the Belalcázar incident among a series of grievances and resignations that have surfaced in a matter of days, alongside other names already on the public radar, and mentions that Ferraz declared an enhancement of the protocol in reaction to “the cases coming to light.” The political backdrop—amid escalating public and media scrutiny—contributes to understanding why these matters are being addressed through swift organizational actions (membership revocations, resignations, internal investigations), despite the fact that determining complete accountability may require more time.
What may happen next
From this point, three paths generally emerge (not necessarily exclusive to one another):
- Local institutional track: the departure of the mayor compels the town council to restructure its government (in accordance with applicable local regulations).
- Party/organizational track: the PSOE may proceed with its internal investigation and, based on what is confirmed, implement further actions.
- Judicial track: if a complaint is present before the prosecution service or a court, the progression and extent will rely on procedural actions and judicial decisions.
In this instance, the PSOE has chosen, in many instances revealed this year, to conceal them and refrain from notifying the authorities, a decision that has been condemned by both the public and political figures.