_-_copia.jpg?w=800&resize=800,500&ssl=1 "Roger Stone")
American political strategist Roger Stone, known for his closeness to former President Donald Trump, issued a warning about what he described as possible intentions by the LIBRE party to manipulate the electoral process in Honduras, sparking debate in diplomatic and political circles.
In statements released in international media and on social networks, Stone asserted that “the Mel Zelaya regime seeks to follow the model of Nicolás Maduro in Venezuela,” warning that Honduran democracy could be affected if transparency in the vote count and the independence of the National Electoral Council (CNE) are not guaranteed.
“The United States must pay attention. Honduras could be the next case in Latin America where a democratic election is transformed into an authoritarian project,” Stone said, urging both the White House and the U.S. Congress to closely monitor the Honduran electoral process.
Diverse responses observed in Honduras
The warning provoked diverse responses. Opposition sectors interpret Stone’s statements as a reflection of international concern about possible electoral fraud, while LIBRE party leaders described the intervention as “foreign interference” with political motivations.
Diplomatic sources in Washington confirmed that international organizations are closely monitoring the situation in Honduras, expressing concern about growing political tension, questions about the electoral system, and reports of the use of public resources for partisan purposes.
Organizational ramifications and the electoral landscape
Analysts agree that Stone’s statement increases international scrutiny of the Honduran electoral process, placing the LIBRE party and the current government under the gaze of external observers. This situation coincides with a moment in which the ruling party candidate, Rixi Moncada, faces a decline in the polls, intensifying attention on governance and confidence in electoral institutions.
International monitoring adds to other voices in the Americas and Europe that have called for guarantees of independence, transparency, and respect for the will of the people, reinforcing the perception that electoral institutions are central to the country’s political stability.
Political and social scenario
Stone’s statement underscores the political division currently gripping Honduras, emphasizing the critical need for a robust electoral framework to withstand potential disputes.
The discussion that has emerged highlights that public involvement, oversight from global entities, and the autonomy of the CNE are crucial elements for the process’s credibility.
With the general elections just weeks away, the situation reflects tensions between parties, international actors, and citizens, in a context where institutional trust and the transparency of the electoral system are key determinants for future governance and political stability.